Car comparison

Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lamborghini Urus

4.0 V8

650 hp3996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2022
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

Trackhawk 6.2 V8

710 hp6166 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    305 km/h
    190 mph
  • Lightest
    2,200 kg
    4,850 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    295 hp/t
    220 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.7 L/100 km
    18.5 mpg US
    22.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    669 km
    416 mi
  • Best overall score
    89/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLamborghiniUrus4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
650hp485kW
710hp529kW
Torque
850Nm627lb-ft
868Nm640lb-ft
Curb weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,483kg5,474lb
Gross weight-
2,993kg6,598lb
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
To 99% top speed
83.8s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
52.7s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.6s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
12.8s
11.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb
Calculated
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
386Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
669km416mi
Calculated
544km338mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,996cc244cu in
6,166cc376cu in
Length
5,112mm201in
4,846mm191in
Width
2,016mm79in
1,954mm77in
Height
1,638mm64in
1,749mm69in
Wheelbase
3,003mm118in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,695mm67in
1,669mm66in
Rear track
1,710mm67in
1,661mm65in
Ground clearance
248mm10in
210mm8in
Trunk volume
616L
800L
Max trunk volume
1,596L
1,689L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
93L
CO2 emissions
290g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V86,000 rpm2,250-4,500 rpm6,800 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V86,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLamborghiniUrus4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.6 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.8 s
11.5 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
119 mph
200 km/h
125 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
650 hp
485 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
710 hp
529 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has 60 hp more than Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
868 Nm
640 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
2,200 kg
4,850 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
2,483 kg
5,474 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
305 km/h
190 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
289 km/h
180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V83.6 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V83.7 s

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has more power, Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
669 km
416 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
544 km
338 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
650 hp
485 kW
3.6 s
305 km/h
190 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
710 hp
529 kW
3.7 s
289 km/h
180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
Power
650 hp
485 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,112 mm
201.3 in
Height
1,638 mm
64.5 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
Power
650 hp
485 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
3.6 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLamborghiniUrus4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
650 hp
485 kW
710 hp
529 kW
Torque
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
868 Nm
640 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.6 s
3.7 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
Lightness
2,200 kg
4,850 lb
2,483 kg
5,474 lb
Fuel consumption
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,112 mm
201.3 in
Height
1,638 mm
64.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in
Range score
669 km
416 mi
544 km
338 mi
CO2 score
290 g/km
-
Trunk score
616 L
21.8 cu ft
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
295 hp/t
220 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLamborghini Urus 4.0 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.22 LC100 km29.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi35.77 LC100 mi48.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,334 LC/year4,489 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8

  • Is 283 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 125 km (78 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.0 V8
SPEED 6.0 TSI W12
VS
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12
4.0 V8
Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
VS
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
707 4.0 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsAston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
Long Range 100 kWh
VS
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8vsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsMaseratiLevanteTrofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
6.5 V12
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsFerrariPurosangue6.5 V12
4.0 V8
Performance 100 kWh
VS
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8vsTeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsLamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
SVR 5.0i V8
VS
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster