Car comparison

Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lamborghini Urus

S 4.0 V8

666 hp3996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2022-2024
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

Trackhawk 6.2 V8

710 hp6166 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    305 km/h
    190 mph
  • Lightest
    2,197 kg
    4,844 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    303 hp/t
    226 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.1 L/100 km
    16.7 mpg US
    20.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    603 km
    375 mi
  • Best overall score
    90/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100
  • Best economy score
    69/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
666hp497kW
710hp529kW
Torque
850Nm627lb-ft
868Nm640lb-ft
Curb weight
2,197kg4,844lb
2,483kg5,474lb
Gross weight-
2,993kg6,598lb
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
To 99% top speed
82.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
52.8s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
12.5s
11.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
303hp/t226kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
603km375mi
Calculated
544km338mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,996cc244cu in
6,166cc376cu in
Length
5,112mm201in
4,846mm191in
Width
2,018mm79in
1,954mm77in
Height
1,638mm64in
1,749mm69in
Wheelbase
3,003mm118in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,695mm67in
1,669mm66in
Rear track
1,710mm67in
1,661mm65in
Ground clearance-
210mm8in
Trunk volume
616L
800L
Max trunk volume-
1,689L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
93L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V86,000 rpm2,300-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V86,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.5 s
11.5 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
200 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
666 hp
497 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
710 hp
529 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has 44 hp more than Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 44 hp (33 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
868 Nm
640 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
2,197 kg
4,844 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
2,483 kg
5,474 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
305 km/h
190 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
289 km/h
180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V83.5 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V83.7 s

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has more power, Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
303 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
603 km
375 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
544 km
338 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
666 hp
497 kW
3.5 s
305 km/h
190 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
710 hp
529 kW
3.7 s
289 km/h
180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
Power
666 hp
497 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,112 mm
201.3 in
Height
1,638 mm
64.5 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
Power
666 hp
497 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
3.5 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8
303 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
666 hp
497 kW
710 hp
529 kW
Torque
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
868 Nm
640 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
3.7 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
Lightness
2,197 kg
4,844 lb
2,483 kg
5,474 lb
Fuel consumption
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,112 mm
201.3 in
Height
1,638 mm
64.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in
Range score
603 km
375 mi
544 km
338 mi
Trunk score
616 L
21.8 cu ft
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
303 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.68 LC100 km29.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.71 LC100 mi48.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,701 LC/year4,489 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8

  • Is 286 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 4.0 V8
707 4.0 V8
VS
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8vsAston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsLamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
Speed 4.0 V8
VS
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 4.0 V8
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
SPEED 6.0 TSI W12
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsBentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12
S 4.0 V8
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
S 4.0 V8
performance 4.0 TFSI V8
VS
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8vsAUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Long Range 100 kWh
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
S 4.0 V8
6.5 V12
VS
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8vsFerrariPurosangue6.5 V12
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsMaseratiLevanteTrofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
VS
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
S 4.0 V8
100 kWh
VS
LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8vsAUDIE7X100 kWh
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster