Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Fastest top speed289 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful710 hp529 kW
- Lightest2,483 kg5,474 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk800 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 710hp529kW | 687hp512kW |
| Torque | 868Nm640lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,483kg5,474lb | 2,615kg5,765lb |
| Gross weight | 2,993kg6,598lb | 3,195kg7,044lb |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.8s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 34.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 382Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,166cc376cu in | - |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 1,931mm76in |
| Height | 1,749mm69in | 1,672mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,661mm65in | 1,659mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 210mm8in | 184mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 800L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,689L | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 93L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW |
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.5 s |
Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW | 3.7 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 710 hp 529 kW | 687 hp 512 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 800 L 28.3 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 132 kg lighter
- Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 132 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























