Car comparison

Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aston Martin DBX

707 4.0 V8

707 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2022-present
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017

Trackhawk 6.2 V8

710 hp6166 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    320 km/h
    199 mph Unrestricted
    310 km/h
    193 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    900 Nm
    664 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,245 kg
    4,949 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    315 hp/t
    235 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.2 L/100 km
    16.6 mpg US
    19.9 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    91/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    69/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
707hp527kW
710hp529kW
Torque
900Nm664lb-ft
868Nm640lb-ft
Curb weight
2,245kg4,949lb
2,483kg5,474lb
Gross weight
3,020kg6,658lb
2,993kg6,598lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Calculated
289 km/h
180 mph
To 99% top speed
45.8s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph
Calculated
52.8s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.3s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
9.1s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.2s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.8s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
315hp/t235kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
544km338mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
6,166cc376cu in
Length
5,039mm198in
4,846mm191in
Width
1,998mm79in
1,954mm77in
Height
1,680mm66in
1,749mm69in
Wheelbase
3,060mm120in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,698mm67in
1,669mm66in
Rear track
1,664mm66in
1,661mm65in
Ground clearance
235mm9in
210mm8in
Trunk volume
638L
800L
Max trunk volume-
1,689L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
93L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V86,000 rpm2,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V86,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.2 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.3 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.1 s
11.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Likely limited
289 km/h
180 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.2 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.2 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.8 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
220 km/h
137 mph
200 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
707 hp
527 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
710 hp
529 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has 3 hp more than Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
868 Nm
640 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
2,245 kg
4,949 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
2,483 kg
5,474 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
289 km/h
180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V83.3 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V83.7 s

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has more power, Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
707 hp
527 kW
3.3 s
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
710 hp
529 kW
3.7 s
289 km/h
180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
Power
707 hp
527 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Length
5,039 mm
198.4 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
Power
707 hp
527 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
3.3 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Power
707 hp
527 kW
710 hp
529 kW
Torque
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
868 Nm
640 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.3 s
3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
289 km/h
180 mph
Lightness
2,245 kg
4,949 lb
2,483 kg
5,474 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
638 L
22.5 cu ft
Length
5,039 mm
198.4 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,749 mm
68.9 in
Range score
-
544 km
338 mi
Trunk score
638 L
22.5 cu ft
800 L
28.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km29.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi48.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year4,489 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8

  • Has 32 Nm more
  • Is 238 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

707 4.0 V8
6.5 V12
VS
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8vsFerrariPurosangue6.5 V12
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsLamborghiniUrus4.0 V8
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
SPEED 6.0 TSI W12
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsBentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12
707 4.0 V8
Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
VS
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Long Range 100 kWh
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsMaseratiLevanteTrofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
707 4.0 V8
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsJaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
707 4.0 V8
performance 4.0 TFSI V8
VS
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8vsAUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8
707 4.0 V8
AMG GLS 63 V8
VS
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8
707 4.0 V8
100 kWh
VS
Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8vsAUDIE7X100 kWh
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
SVR 5.0i V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster