Ferrari Purosangue
Car comparison
Ferrari Purosangue 6.5 V12vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Purosangue 6.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Most powerful725 hp541 kW
- Lightest2,033 kg4,482 lb
- Best power-to-weight357 hp/t266 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score91/100
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Highest torque868 Nm640 lb-ft
- Largest trunk800 L
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 725hp541kW | 710hp529kW |
| Torque | 716Nm528lb-ft | 868Nm640lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,033kg4,482lb | 2,483kg5,474lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,993kg6,598lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 52.8s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.3s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 357hp/t266kW/t162hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 352Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 544km338mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,496cc396cu in | 6,166cc376cu in |
| Length | 4,973mm196in | 4,846mm191in |
| Width | 2,028mm80in | 1,954mm77in |
| Height | 1,589mm63in | 1,749mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 3,018mm119in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | 1,737mm68in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,720mm68in | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 473L | 800L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,689L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 93L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Purosangue 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | 7,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.3 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 11.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | 725 hp 541 kW |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW |
Ferrari Purosangue 6.5 V12 has 15 hp more than Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 and Ferrari Purosangue 6.5 V12: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | 716 Nm 528 lb-ft |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | 2,033 kg 4,482 lb |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | 3.3 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Purosangue 6.5 V12 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | 357 hp/t 266 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | 725 hp 541 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW | 3.7 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariPurosangue6.5 V12 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 725 hp 541 kW | 710 hp 529 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 716 Nm 528 lb-ft | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.3 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,033 kg 4,482 lb | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 544 km 338 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 473 L 16.7 cu ft | 800 L 28.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 357 hp/t 266 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Purosangue 6.5 V12
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 450 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 71 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Has 152 Nm more
- Has 327 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























