Bentley Bentayga · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga · Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSIvsLamborghini Urus 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Urus
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Most powerful650 hp485 kW
- Lightest2,200 kg4,850 lb
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range669 km416 mi
- Largest trunk616 L
- Best overall score89/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 650hp485kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,508kg5,529lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.9s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.8s Calculated | 12.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.7L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 386Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 594km369mi Calculated | 669km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,144mm203in | 5,112mm201in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 2,016mm79in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,638mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 3,003mm118in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | 1,695mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,707mm67in | 1,710mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 247mm10in | 248mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 616L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,596L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 290g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 5,000-5,750 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.8 s | 12.8 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 192 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 635 hp 474 kW |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 has 15 hp more than Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI and Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 2,508 kg 5,529 lb |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 3.9 s |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 3.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 and Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 and Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 594 km 369 mi |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 669 km 416 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.9 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 3.6 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 650 hp 485 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,508 kg 5,529 lb | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 594 km 369 mi | 669 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 290 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 308 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Has 132 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























