Bentley Bentayga · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga · Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Lightest2,508 kg5,529 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t189 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
- Largest trunk520 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 626hp467kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,508kg5,529lb | 2,615kg5,765lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,195kg7,044lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 33.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.9s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.7L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 239hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 594km369mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | - |
| Length | 5,144mm203in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,931mm76in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,672mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,707mm67in | 1,659mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 247mm10in | 184mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.9 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 635 hp 474 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 626 hp 467 kW |
Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 2,508 kg 5,529 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.7 s |
Although Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 239 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.9 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 626 hp 467 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 2020Speed 6.0 W12 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 626 hp 467 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,508 kg 5,529 lb | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 594 km 369 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 239 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 Speed 6.0 W12 TSI
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Has 76 km/h (47 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























