Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguar F-Pace 25t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

25t

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Jaguar F-Pace 25t

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    1,831 kg
    4,037 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,065 km
    662 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-Pace25t
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,941kg4,279lb
1,831kg4,037lb
Gross weight
2,529kg5,575lb
2,460kg5,423lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
79.2s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
36.9s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
938km583mi
Calculated
1,065km662mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,699mm185in
4,731mm186in
Width
1,882mm74in
2,071mm82in
Height
1,685mm66in
1,666mm66in
Wheelbase
2,789mm110in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,567mm62in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
197mm8in
215mm8in
Trunk volume
230L
-
Max trunk volume
1,950L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
60L
82L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
175g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIJaguar F-Pace 25tPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 25t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarF-Pace25t5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-Pace25t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.9 s
38.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
JaguarF-Pace25t
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 25t has 10 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar F-Pace 25t: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace25t
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
JaguarF-Pace25t
1,831 kg
4,037 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph
JaguarF-Pace25t
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s
JaguarF-Pace25t7.0 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace 25t has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace25t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar F-Pace 25t: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace25t
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi
JaguarF-Pace25t
1,065 km
662 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph
JaguarF-Pace25t
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
JaguarF-Pace25t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace25t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s
JaguarF-Pace25t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace25t
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-Pace25t
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
1,831 kg
4,037 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Range score
938 km
583 mi
1,065 km
662 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
175 g/km
Trunk score
230 L
8.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIJaguar F-Pace 25t
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 135 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Jaguar F-Pace 25t

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Jaguar F-Pace 25t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
25t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace25tvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 BiTDI
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarF-Pace25d
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
25t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace25tvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
25t
2.0
VS
JaguarF-Pace25tvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
25t
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace25tvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
45 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC402.0 T5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI vs Jaguar F-Pace 25t - car comparison - FastVsFaster