Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 2.0 · Stage 3vsInfiniti Q50 2.0 · Stage 2vsInfiniti Q50 2.0 · Stage 1vsInfiniti Q50 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50
2.0 (Stage 2)
Infiniti Q50
2.0 (Stage 1)
Infiniti Q50
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed287 km/h178 mph
- Most powerful317 hp236 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest1,617 kg3,565 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions151 g/km
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | InfinitiQ502.0211 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 317hp236kW+106 hp | 274hp205kW+63 hp | 249hp186kW+38 hp | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,617kg3,565lb |
| Top speed | 287 km/h 178 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 284 km/h / 177 mph-9.1 s Calculated | 64.0s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph-4.6 s Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph-1.6 s Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s-1.6 s | 6.1s-1.1 s | 6.5s-0.7 s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s-8.8 s Calculated | 17.8s-6.5 s Calculated | 19.6s-4.7 s Calculated | 24.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.8s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.0s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.4s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 1,231km765mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,790mm189in | 4,790mm189in | 4,790mm189in | 4,790mm189in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,565mm62in | 1,565mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 500L | 500L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L | 80L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | 151g/km | 151g/km | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 2) 274 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 1) 249 hp: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 2.0 211 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | InfinitiQ502.0211 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.8 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 17.8 s | 19.6 s | 24.3 s |
| Top speed | 287 km/h 178 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.4 s | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.9 s | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 14.0 s | 14.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 176 km/h 110 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 317 hp 236 kW |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 274 hp 205 kW |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 249 hp 186 kW |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 211 hp 157 kW |
Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp has 106 hp more than Infiniti Q50 2.0 211 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 211 hp and Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp: 106 hp (79 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 287 km/h 178 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 5.6 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 6.1 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 6.5 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp and Infiniti Q50 2.0 211 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 2) 274 hp and Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 1) 249 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 170 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 1,231 km 765 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 317 hp 236 kW | 5.6 s | 287 km/h 178 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 274 hp 205 kW | 6.1 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 249 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | 170 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 3)317 hp | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 2)274 hp | InfinitiQ502.0 (Stage 1)249 hp | InfinitiQ502.0211 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 317 hp 236 kW | 274 hp 205 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 287 km/h 178 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,231 km 765 mi | 1,231 km 765 mi | 1,231 km 765 mi | 1,231 km 765 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | 151 g/km | 151 g/km | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp | Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 2) 274 hp | Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 1) 249 hp | Infiniti Q50 2.0 211 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 3) 317 hp
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Infiniti Q50 2.0 (Stage 2) 274 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























