Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 2.0vsRenault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Talisman
1.6 Energy TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions127 g/km
- Largest trunk608 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ502.0 | RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.3s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 911km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,790mm189in | 4,849mm191in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,868mm74in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,463mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,808mm111in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 608L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,022L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 2.0: Power / Torque
- Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ502.0 | RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.3 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 200 hp 149 kW |
Infiniti Q50 2.0 has 11 hp more than Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe and Infiniti Q50 2.0: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 7.2 s |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe and Infiniti Q50 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 911 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ502.0 | RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,231 km 765 mi | 911 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 608 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 2.0 | Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 320 km (199 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe
- Is 187 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 108 L more trunk volume
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























