Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 2.0vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
E 250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ502.0 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,245kg4,949lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.3s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 967km601mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,790mm189in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,474mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,598mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ502.0 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.3 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 7.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 967 km 601 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ502.0 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,231 km 765 mi | 967 km 601 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 2.0 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250
- Is 12 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























