Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 2.0vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,594 kg3,514 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ502.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,594kg3,514lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 70.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.3s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,790mm189in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ502.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.3 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 4 hp more than Infiniti Q50 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has more power, Infiniti Q50 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Infiniti Q50 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,500 km 932 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ502.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,231 km 765 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 2.0 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 23 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 269 km (167 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























