Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 2.0vsVolkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,361 kg3,000 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk510 L
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ502.0 | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,361kg3,000lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.3s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,790mm189in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,538mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ502.0 | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.3 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Infiniti Q50 2.0 has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI and Infiniti Q50 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 1,361 kg 3,000 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ502.0 | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,361 kg 3,000 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,231 km 765 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 2.0 | Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 456 km (283 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Is 256 kg lighter
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























