Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 2.0vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions151 g/km
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ502.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.3s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,231km765mi Calculated | 840km522mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,790mm189in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ502.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.3 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Infiniti Q50 2.0 has 11 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Infiniti Q50 2.0: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 7.2 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,231 km 765 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ502.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,231 km 765 mi | 840 km 522 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 2.0 | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 391 km (243 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 87 kg lighter
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























