Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0

200 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    138 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    952 km
    592 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    179 g/km
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
240hp179kW
200hp149kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight-
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
28.6s
Calculated
27.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
952km592mi
Calculated
840km522mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,130mm202in
4,672mm184in
Width
1,899mm75in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,416mm56in
Wheelbase
3,032mm119in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,626mm64in
-
Rear track
1,604mm63in
-
Trunk volume-
455L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
63L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.05,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXE (X760)2.05,500 rpm1,750-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.6 s
27.6 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
200 hp
149 kW

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 40 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
241 km/h
150 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.07.9 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.07.7 s

Although Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
952 km
592 mi
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
840 km
522 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
7.7 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Range score
952 km
592 mi
840 km
522 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
179 g/km
Trunk score
-
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 112 km (70 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Is 205 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 20 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
D180
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0
4.2 V8 32V L
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0
6.0 V12 Classic
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0
1.6 Energy TCe
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsRenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe
2.0
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
2.0
C 200
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0 vs Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster