Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions132 g/km
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best estimated range840 km522 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.4s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 719km447mi Calculated | 840km522mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 132g/km | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.7 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 719 km 447 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 719 km 447 mi | 840 km 522 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 132 g/km | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 47 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























