Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 D5vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Lightest1,594 kg3,514 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 D5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,953kg4,306lb | 1,594kg3,514lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,091km678mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | - | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 D5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 D5 has 20 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo S90 2.0 D5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 1,953 kg 4,306 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 7.0 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo S90 2.0 D5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 1,091 km 678 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,500 km 932 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 D5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,953 kg 4,306 lb | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,091 km 678 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 D5 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Is 359 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 409 km (254 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























