Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5vsAUDI A8L (D4/4H) · Facelift 2013 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A8L (D4/4H) · Facelift 2013
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,594 kg3,514 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,594kg3,514lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,520kg5,556lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,500km932mi Calculated | 1,238km769mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 5,265mm207in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,949mm77in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 3,122mm123in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,635mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 335L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 146g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 4 hp more than AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 2.0 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,500 km 932 mi |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 1,238 km 769 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.9 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20132.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,500 km 932 mi | 1,238 km 769 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 146 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 | AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 326 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 262 km (163 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) Facelift 2013 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























