Car comparison

Volvo S90 2.0 D5vsJaguar XF (X260) 25d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S90

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2018-2020
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

25d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,733 kg
    3,821 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    138 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,158 km
    719 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Volvo S90 2.0 D5

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS902.0 D5JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
235hp175kW
240hp179kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,953kg4,306lb
1,733kg3,821lb
Gross weight-
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
246 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
68.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,091km678mi
Calculated
1,158km719mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,963mm195in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,879mm74in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,941mm116in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,628mm64in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
500L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S90 2.0 D5Jaguar XF (X260) 25dPowerTorque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS902.0 D54,000 rpm-5,000 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)25d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS902.0 D5JaguarXF (X260)25d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
23.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
246 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
162 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
JaguarXF (X260)25d
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d has 5 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)25d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
1,953 kg
4,306 lb
JaguarXF (X260)25d
1,733 kg
3,821 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXF (X260)25d
246 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D57.0 s
JaguarXF (X260)25d6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Volvo S90 2.0 D5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)25d
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
1,091 km
678 mi
JaguarXF (X260)25d
1,158 km
719 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS902.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXF (X260)25d
240 hp
179 kW
6.9 s
246 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS902.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS902.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS902.0 D5
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
7.0 s
JaguarXF (X260)25d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS902.0 D5
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25d
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS902.0 D5JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
235 hp
175 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,953 kg
4,306 lb
1,733 kg
3,821 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,091 km
678 mi
1,158 km
719 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
155 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S90 2.0 D5Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S90 2.0 D5

  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 11 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 220 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo S90 2.0 D5 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 25d - car comparison - FastVsFaster