Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 D5vsJaguar XF (X260) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,733 kg3,821 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,158 km719 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 D5 | JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,953kg4,306lb | 1,733kg3,821lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 68.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 23.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,091km678mi Calculated | 1,158km719mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | - | 5,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 D5 | JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 23.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d has 5 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 1,953 kg 4,306 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 7.0 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Volvo S90 2.0 D5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 1,091 km 678 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 1,158 km 719 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)25d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D5 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)25d | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 D5 | JaguarXF (X260)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,953 kg 4,306 lb | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,091 km 678 mi | 1,158 km 719 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 D5 | Jaguar XF (X260) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























