Car comparison

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsInfiniti Q50 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Phideon

380TSI

224 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2016-present
VS

Infiniti Q50

2.0

211 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Infiniti Q50 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,617 kg
    3,565 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,231 km
    765 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    224 hp
    167 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenPhideon380TSIInfinitiQ502.0
Power
224hp167kW
211hp157kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,815kg4,001lb
1,617kg3,565lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
84.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
24.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,071km666mi
Calculated
1,231km765mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,991cc121cu in
Length
5,074mm200in
4,790mm189in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,489mm59in
1,445mm57in
Wheelbase
3,009mm118in
2,850mm112in
Front track-
1,545mm61in
Rear track-
1,565mm62in
Trunk volume-
500L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
80L
CO2 emissions-
151g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIInfiniti Q50 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
  • Infiniti Q50 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI4,500-6,250 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
InfinitiQ502.05,500 rpm1,250-3,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenPhideon380TSIInfinitiQ502.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
24.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
InfinitiQ502.0
211 hp
157 kW

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has 13 hp more than Infiniti Q50 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
InfinitiQ502.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
InfinitiQ502.0
1,617 kg
3,565 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
InfinitiQ502.0
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI8.1 s
InfinitiQ502.07.2 s

Although Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has more power, Infiniti Q50 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
InfinitiQ502.0
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 2.0 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
InfinitiQ502.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,071 km
666 mi
InfinitiQ502.0
1,231 km
765 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
8.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
InfinitiQ502.0
211 hp
157 kW
7.2 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
InfinitiQ502.0
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,790 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
InfinitiQ502.0
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Infiniti Q50 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.1 s
InfinitiQ502.0
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
InfinitiQ502.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenPhideon380TSIInfinitiQ502.0
Power
224 hp
167 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
1,617 kg
3,565 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,790 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Range score
1,071 km
666 mi
1,231 km
765 mi
CO2 score
-
151 g/km
Trunk score
-
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Phideon 380TSIInfiniti Q50 2.0
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Infiniti Q50 2.0

  • Is 198 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
Infiniti Q50 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

380TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
E 250
VS
InfinitiQ502.0vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250
380TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
2.0
C 250d
VS
InfinitiQ502.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
380TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.0
E 250
VS
InfinitiQ502.0vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250
380TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0
2.0
VS
InfinitiQ502.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
380TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI
2.0
S 300 BlueTEC
VS
InfinitiQ502.0vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 300 BlueTEC
380TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenLavida IIFacelift 20151.4 TSI
2.0
Veloce 2.2 JTD
VS
InfinitiQ502.0vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI vs Infiniti Q50 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster