Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4vsHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020
2.2 CRDi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Lightest1,950 kg4,299 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Most powerful202 hp151 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight102 hp/t76 kW/t9.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk782 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 202hp151kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,984kg4,374lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,600kg5,732lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 95.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 66.5s Calculated | 73.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,203km748mi Calculated | 1,136km706mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,151cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,785mm188in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,765mm109in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,646mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 176mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 782L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,649L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 3,800 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 66.5 s | 73.8 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW |
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has 5 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 1,984 kg 4,374 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 9.2 s |
Although Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 1,136 km 706 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW | 9.2 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 202 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | 1,984 kg 4,374 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,203 km 748 mi | 1,136 km 706 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 782 L 27.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 | Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Is 34 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 277 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























