Car comparison

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDivsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020

2.2 CRDi

202 hp2151 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2022
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi

  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    202 hp
    151 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,136 km
    706 mi
  • Largest trunk
    782 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDiMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
202hp151kW
186hp139kW
Torque
440Nm325lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,984kg4,374lb
1,554kg3,426lb
Gross weight
2,600kg5,732lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
95.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
81.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.2s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
73.8s
Calculated
67.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.7s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.7s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,136km706mi
Calculated
727km452mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,151cc131cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,785mm188in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,685mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,765mm109in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,646mm65in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,656mm65in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
176mm7in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
782L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,649L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
67L
48L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDiMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi3,800 rpm1,750-2,750 rpm4,050 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDiMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.7 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.2 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
73.8 s
67.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.0 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.7 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
136 km/h
85 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
202 hp
151 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has 16 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
1,984 kg
4,374 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,554 kg
3,426 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi9.2 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X9.0 s

Although Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has more power, Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
1,136 km
706 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
727 km
452 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
202 hp
151 kW
9.2 s
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
9.0 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
9.2 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDiMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
202 hp
151 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.2 s
9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,984 kg
4,374 lb
1,554 kg
3,426 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,136 km
706 mi
727 km
452 mi
Trunk score
782 L
27.6 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDiMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 408 km (254 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 352 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Is 430 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) 2.2 CRDi
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2 CRDi
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2 CRDi
1.6T
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsHyundaiKona II1.6T
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.2 CRDi
2.0i
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.2 CRDi
380 TSI
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsVolkswagenTalagon380 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.2 CRDi
350h
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.2 CRDi
2.0 B4
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2 CRDi
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster