Car comparison

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    186 hp
    139 kW
  • Highest torque
    240 Nm
    177 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    727 km
    452 mi
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
186hp139kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
207Nm153lb-ft
Curb weight
1,554kg3,426lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
1,773kg3,909lb
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
81.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
67.9s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
727km452mi
Calculated
629km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,540mm61in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,655mm105in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,565mm62in
1,523mm60in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance
180mm7in
155mm6in
Trunk volume
430L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,406L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
44L
CO2 emissions-
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
67.9 s
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has 36 hp more than Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 36 hp (27 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,554 kg
3,426 lb
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X9.0 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G8.8 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has more power, Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
727 km
452 mi
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
9.0 s
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
9.0 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
186 hp
139 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,554 kg
3,426 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
727 km
452 mi
629 km
391 mi
CO2 score
-
160 g/km
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Has 36 hp more
  • Has 33 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 99 km (61 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Is 244 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2 CRDi
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
40 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLA 200
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X vs Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G - car comparison - FastVsFaster