Lexus NX II (AZ20)
Car comparison
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350hvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range932 km579 mi
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lightest1,554 kg3,426 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 239Nm176lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,554kg3,426lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 81.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 57.4s Calculated | 67.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 132Nm/t88lb-ft/ton Calculated | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 932km579mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,487cc152cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,625mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 195mm8in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,436L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 48L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 6,000 rpm | 4,300-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 57.4 s | 67.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Limited | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW |
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 239 Nm 176 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 8.7 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 932 km 579 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW | 9.0 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusNX II (AZ20)350h | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 239 Nm 176 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 932 km 579 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 205 km (127 mi) more estimated range
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Has 1 Nm more
- Is 256 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























