Mazda CX-30
Car comparison
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazda CX-3 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-3
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful186 hp139 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mazda CX-3 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Lightest1,235 kg2,723 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | MazdaCX-32.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 186hp139kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 204Nm150lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,554kg3,426lb | 1,235kg2,723lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 67.9s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 727km452mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,275mm168in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,540mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,655mm105in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,523mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,521mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 180mm7in | 155mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,406L | 1,260L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-3 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | MazdaCX-32.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 67.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has 36 hp more than Mazda CX-3 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-3 2.0i and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 204 Nm 150 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 9.0 s |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 8.7 s |
Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has more power, Mazda CX-3 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-3 2.0i and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 727 km 452 mi |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW | 9.0 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-32.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-32.0i |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | MazdaCX-32.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 186 hp 139 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 204 Nm 150 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 727 km 452 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X | Mazda CX-3 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 36 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-3 2.0i
- Is 319 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























