Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDivsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful202 hp151 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,196 km743 mi
- Largest trunk831 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Lightest1,554 kg3,426 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 202hp151kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,871kg4,125lb | 1,554kg3,426lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 81.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 70.9s Calculated | 67.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,196km743mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,151cc131cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,785mm188in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,685mm66in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,661mm65in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 176mm7in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 831L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,704L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 48L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 3,800 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 70.9 s | 67.9 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 137 km/h 85 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW |
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has 16 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 9.0 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 9.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 1,196 km 743 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW | 9.0 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 202 hp 151 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,196 km 743 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 831 L 29.3 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 469 km (292 mi) more estimated range
- Has 401 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Is 317 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























