Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020

2.2 CRDi

202 hp2151 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.4 s
Fastest top speed
220 km/h
137 mph Unrestricted
212 km/h
132 mph Restricted
Highest torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Lightest
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
Best power-to-weight
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Best estimated range
1,184 km
736 mi
Best overall score
60/100
Best performance score
48/100
Best economy score
94/100

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi

Most powerful
202 hp
151 kW
Largest trunk
782 L
Best practicality score
92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Power	200hp149kW	202hp151kW
Torque	450Nm332lb-ft	440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight	1,905kg4,200lb	1,984kg4,374lb
Gross weight	2,500kg5,512lb	2,600kg5,732lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Calculated	205 km/h 127 mph
To 99% top speed	96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated	95.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.4s	9.2s
0-200 km/h	44.1s Calculated	73.8s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.9s Calculated	8.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK	5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	-	6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	-	5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.1s Calculated	16.7s Calculated
Power-to-weight	105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated	102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated	222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,184km736mi Calculated	1,136km706mi Calculated
Displacement	3,283cc200cu in	2,151cc131cu in
Length	4,745mm187in	4,785mm188in
Width	1,890mm74in	1,900mm75in
Height	1,687mm66in	1,685mm66in
Wheelbase	2,870mm113in	2,765mm109in
Front track	1,640mm65in	1,646mm65in
Rear track	1,645mm65in	1,656mm65in
Ground clearance	175mm7in	176mm7in
Trunk volume	477L	782L
Max trunk volume	1,726L	1,649L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	7
Fuel tank	58L	67L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDiPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	3,000-4,200 rpm	1,400-3,000 rpm	4,450 rpm
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	3,800 rpm	1,750-2,750 rpm	4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.9 s	8.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.4 s	9.2 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	44.1 s	73.8 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Limited	205 km/h 127 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.6 s	2.6 s
330 ft 101 m	6.9 s	7.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.5 s	10.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.5 s	14.0 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.1 s	16.7 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	142 km/h 88 mph	136 km/h 85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	200 hp 149 kW
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	202 hp 151 kW

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has 2 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	450 Nm 332 lb-ft
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	440 Nm 325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	1,905 kg 4,200 lb
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	1,984 kg 4,374 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	205 km/h 127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	8.4 s
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	9.2 s

Although Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has more power, Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	1,184 km 736 mi
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	1,136 km 706 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	200 hp 149 kW	8.4 s	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	202 hp 151 kW	9.2 s	205 km/h 127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	8.4 s
Top speed Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	477 L 16.8 cu ft
Length	4,745 mm 186.8 in
Height	1,687 mm 66.4 in

HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi

Power	202 hp 151 kW
0-100 km/h	9.2 s
Top speed 205 km/h 127 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	782 L 27.6 cu ft
Length	4,785 mm 188.4 in
Height	1,685 mm 66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	8.4 s
Top speed Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph

4.9 L/100 km

48.0 mpg US

57.6 mpg UK

HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi

Power	202 hp 151 kW
0-100 km/h	9.2 s
Top speed 205 km/h 127 mph

5.9 L/100 km

39.9 mpg US

47.9 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK	8.4 s
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK	9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D	105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp	4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi	102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp	5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D

HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi

Power

200 hp

149 kW

202 hp

151 kW

Torque

450 Nm

332 lb-ft

440 Nm

325 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.4 s

9.2 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

220 km/h137 mph

Restricted

212 km/h132 mph

205 km/h

127 mph

Lightness

1,905 kg

4,200 lb

1,984 kg

4,374 lb

Fuel consumption

4.9 L/100 km

48.0 mpg US

57.6 mpg UK

5.9 L/100 km

39.9 mpg US

47.9 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	477 L 16.8 cu ft
Length	4,745 mm 186.8 in
Height	1,687 mm 66.4 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	782 L 27.6 cu ft
Length	4,785 mm 188.4 in
Height	1,685 mm 66.3 in

Range score

1,184 km

736 mi

1,136 km

706 mi

Trunk score

477 L

16.8 cu ft

782 L

27.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

105 hp/t

78 kW/t

9.5 kg/hp

102 hp/t

76 kW/t

9.8 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D	Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
Consumption	4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK	5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	8.58 LC100 km	10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	13.80 LC100 mi	16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	735 L194 US gal162 UK gal	885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,286 LC/year	1,549 LC/year