Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCivsVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,598 kg3,523 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk695 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score94/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,061 km659 mi
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | - | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,734kg3,823lb | 1,598kg3,523lb |
| Gross weight | 2,505kg5,523lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 106.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.4s Calculated | 48.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,061km659mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,397mm173in |
| Width | 2,154mm85in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,678mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 695L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L | 1,989L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.4 s | 48.2 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi has 23 hp more than Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 23 hp (17 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi has more power, Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,061 km 659 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.2 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,061 km 659 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 695 L 24.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi | Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI
- Is 136 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 410 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























