Car comparison

Opel Grandland X 1.6 TurbovsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Opel Grandland X

1.6 Turbo

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hpGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    514 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    101 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    933 km
    580 mi
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
180hp134kW
155hp116kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,425kg3,142lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
82.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
52.6s
Calculated
51.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
933km580mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
-
Length
4,477mm176in
4,207mm166in
Width
1,856mm73in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,609mm63in
1,538mm61in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,595mm63in
-
Rear track
1,610mm63in
-
Ground clearance
188mm7in
-
Trunk volume
514L
468L
Max trunk volume
1,652L
1,161L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
42L
CO2 emissions
132g/km
101g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Opel Grandland X 1.6 TurboFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
52.6 s
51.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo has 25 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo8.8 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
914 km
568 mi
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
933 km
580 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.8 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
180 hp
134 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
933 km
580 mi
CO2 score
132 g/km
101 g/km
Trunk score
514 L
18.2 cu ft
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleOpel Grandland X 1.6 TurboFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 46 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 220 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 31 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 Turbo
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.6 Turbo
20d
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsJaguarF-Pace20d
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1.6 Turbo
330TSI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1.6 Turbo
2.0 D4
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1.6 Turbo
2.0 T4
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolvoXC402.0 T4
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.6 Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.2 PureTech
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
1.6 Turbo
2.0 TDI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster