Car comparison

Opel Grandland X 1.6 TurbovsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Opel Grandland X

1.6 Turbo

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,078 km
    670 mi
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,425 kg
    3,142 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    132 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    514 L

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,425kg3,142lb
1,921kg4,235lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
84.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
91.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
52.6s
Calculated
70.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
1,078km670mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,477mm176in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,856mm73in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,609mm63in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,595mm63in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
188mm7in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
514L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,652L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
55L
CO2 emissions
132g/km
135g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Opel Grandland X 1.6 TurboVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,740-2,520 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
52.6 s
70.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,921 kg
4,235 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo8.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.8 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
914 km
568 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,078 km
670 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
1,921 kg
4,235 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
1,078 km
670 mi
CO2 score
132 g/km
135 g/km
Trunk score
514 L
18.2 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleOpel Grandland X 1.6 TurboVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Is 496 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 9 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 165 km (102 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 Turbo
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
1.6 Turbo
20d
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
1.6 Turbo
330TSI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
1.6 Turbo
2.0 D4
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 D4
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1.6 Turbo
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 D4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
350h
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1.6 Turbo
1.6 PureTech
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster