Car comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsOpel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)

1.6 PureTech

181 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2021
VS

Opel Grandland X

1.6 Turbo

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    181 hp
    135 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Lightest
    1,425 kg
    3,142 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    914 km
    568 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechOpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
181hp135kW
180hp134kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,429kg3,150lb
1,425kg3,142lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
84.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
52.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
679km422mi
Calculated
914km568mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,447mm175in
4,477mm176in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,856mm73in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,609mm63in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,595mm63in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
219mm9in
188mm7in
Trunk volume
520L
514L
Max trunk volume
1,482L
1,652L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
53L
CO2 emissions-
132g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechOpel Grandland X 1.6 TurboPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
  • Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechOpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
52.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech has 1 hp more than Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
1,425 kg
3,142 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
222 km/h
138 mph
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech8.0 s
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
679 km
422 mi
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
914 km
568 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
8.0 s
222 km/h
138 mph
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.0 s
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechOpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
181 hp
135 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
Range score
679 km
422 mi
914 km
568 mi
CO2 score
-
132 g/km
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechOpel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Is 4 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 234 km (146 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 PureTech
1.2 PureTech
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
1.6 Turbo
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1.6 PureTech
20d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
1.6 Turbo
20d
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsJaguarF-Pace20d
1.6 Turbo
330TSI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
1.6 PureTech
GLB 220d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
1.6 Turbo
2.0 D4
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1.6 PureTech
1.2
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2
1.6 Turbo
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 PureTech
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0
1.6 Turbo
2.0 T4
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolvoXC402.0 T4
1.6 Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech vs Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster