Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsOpel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOpel Grandland X
1.6 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions132 g/km
- Best estimated range914 km568 mi
- Largest trunk514 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 84.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.7s Calculated | 52.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 914km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,477mm176in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,856mm73in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,609mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,595mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 188mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 514L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,652L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.7 s | 52.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 has 10 hp more than Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 818 km 508 mi |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 914 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 914 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 514 L 18.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 | Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
- Is 222 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 96 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























