Skoda Karoq · Facelift 2021
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq · Facelift 2021 2.0 TDIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma · Facelift 2024
1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Most powerful155 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,293 kg2,851 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,652kg3,642lb | 1,293kg2,851lb |
| Gross weight | 2,034kg4,484lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.2s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 59.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 926km575mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,390mm173in | 4,186mm165in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,629mm64in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,638mm104in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,526mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 169mm7in | 163mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 521L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 59.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 1,652 kg 3,642 lb |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 8.8 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 926 km 575 mi |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,652 kg 3,642 lb | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 926 km 575 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 359 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























