Car comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2026

1.6 T-GDI

150 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2026-present

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Most powerful
155 hp
116 kW
Lightest
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Best power-to-weight
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Largest trunk
456 L
Best economy score
90/100
Best practicality score
81/100

Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.7 s
Fastest top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Highest torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Best estimated range
725 km
450 mi
Best overall score
54/100
Best performance score
42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power	150hp112kW	155hp116kW
Torque	250Nm184lb-ft	240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight	1,470kg3,241lb	1,293kg2,851lb
Gross weight	1,890kg4,167lb	1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed	203 km/h 126 mph	200 km/h 124 mph
To 99% top speed	78.4s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated	80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.7s	8.7s
0-200 km/h	70.8s Calculated	-
0-60 mph	8.2s Calculated	8.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK	6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.3s Calculated	16.3s Calculated
Power-to-weight	102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated	120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated	186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	725km450mi Calculated	667km414mi Calculated
Displacement	1,598cc98cu in	999cc61cu in
Length	4,380mm172in	4,186mm165in
Width	1,826mm72in	-
Height	1,495mm59in	1,550mm61in
Wheelbase	2,650mm104in	2,588mm102in
Front track	1,585mm62in	1,567mm62in
Rear track	1,583mm62in	1,526mm60in
Ground clearance	-	163mm6in
Trunk volume	426L	456L
Max trunk volume	1,378L	1,216L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	50L	42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	4,500-6,000 rpm	1,500-4,000 rpm	6,250 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6,000 rpm	2,500 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.2 s	8.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.7 s	8.7 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	70.8 s	-
Top speed	203 km/h 126 mph	200 km/h 124 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.6 s
330 ft 101 m	7.1 s	7.0 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.7 s	10.6 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.8 s	13.7 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.3 s	16.3 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	140 km/h 87 mph	139 km/h 86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	150 hp 112 kW
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI.

The biggest power difference is between Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	250 Nm 184 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	240 Nm 177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	1,470 kg 3,241 lb
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	1,293 kg 2,851 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	203 km/h 126 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	200 km/h 124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	8.7 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	8.7 s

Although Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	725 km 450 mi
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	667 km 414 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	150 hp 112 kW	8.7 s	203 km/h 126 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW	8.7 s	200 km/h 124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI

Power	150 hp 112 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed 203 km/h 126 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	426 L 15.0 cu ft
Length	4,380 mm 172.4 in
Height	1,495 mm 58.9 in

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed 200 km/h 124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI

Power	150 hp 112 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed 203 km/h 126 mph

6.9 L/100 km

34.1 mpg US

40.9 mpg UK

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed 200 km/h 124 mph

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK	8.7 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK	8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp	6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power

150 hp

112 kW

155 hp

116 kW

Torque

250 Nm

184 lb-ft

240 Nm

177 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.7 s

Top speed

203 km/h

126 mph

200 km/h

124 mph

Lightness

1,470 kg

3,241 lb

1,293 kg

2,851 lb

Fuel consumption

6.9 L/100 km

34.1 mpg US

40.9 mpg UK

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	426 L 15.0 cu ft
Length	4,380 mm 172.4 in
Height	1,495 mm 58.9 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

Range score

725 km

450 mi

667 km

414 mi

Trunk score

426 L

15.0 cu ft

456 L

16.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

102 hp/t

76 kW/t

9.8 kg/hp

120 hp/t

89 kW/t

8.3 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI	Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption	6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK	6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	12.08 LC100 km	11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	19.43 LC100 mi	17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal	945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,811 LC/year	1,654 LC/year