Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsKia XCeed · Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2026

1.6 T-GDI

150 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.7 s
Fastest top speed
210 km/h
130 mph Unrestricted
200 km/h
124 mph Restricted
Most powerful
155 hp
116 kW
Lightest
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Best power-to-weight
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Largest trunk
456 L
Best overall score
55/100
Best performance score
43/100
Best economy score
90/100
Best practicality score
81/100

Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI

Highest torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Best estimated range
725 km
450 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
Power	155hp116kW	150hp112kW
Torque	240Nm177lb-ft	250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight	1,293kg2,851lb	1,470kg3,241lb
Gross weight	1,835kg4,045lb	1,890kg4,167lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated	203 km/h 126 mph
To 99% top speed	80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated	78.3s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.7s	8.7s
0-200 km/h	50.6s Calculated	70.7s Calculated
0-60 mph	8.2s Calculated	8.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK	6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.3s Calculated	16.3s Calculated
Power-to-weight	120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated	102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated	170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	667km414mi Calculated	725km450mi Calculated
Displacement	999cc61cu in	1,598cc98cu in
Length	4,186mm165in	4,380mm172in
Width	1,805mm71in	1,826mm72in
Height	1,550mm61in	1,495mm59in
Wheelbase	2,588mm102in	2,650mm104in
Front track	1,567mm62in	1,585mm62in
Rear track	1,526mm60in	1,583mm62in
Ground clearance	163mm6in	-
Trunk volume	456L	426L
Max trunk volume	1,216L	1,378L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	42L	50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostKia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDIPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6,000 rpm	2,500 rpm	6,250 rpm
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	4,500-6,000 rpm	1,500-4,000 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.2 s	8.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.7 s	8.7 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	50.6 s	70.7 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited	203 km/h 126 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.7 s
330 ft 101 m	7.1 s	7.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.7 s	10.7 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.8 s	13.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.3 s	16.3 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	142 km/h 88 mph	140 km/h 87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	150 hp 112 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI.

The biggest power difference is between Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	240 Nm 177 lb-ft
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	250 Nm 184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	1,293 kg 2,851 lb
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	1,470 kg 3,241 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	203 km/h 126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	8.7 s
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	8.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	667 km 414 mi
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	725 km 450 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW	8.7 s	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	150 hp 112 kW	8.7 s	203 km/h 126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI

Power	150 hp 112 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed 203 km/h 126 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	426 L 15.0 cu ft
Length	4,380 mm 172.4 in
Height	1,495 mm 58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI

Power	150 hp 112 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed 203 km/h 126 mph

6.9 L/100 km

34.1 mpg US

40.9 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK	8.7 s
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK	8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK
KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI	102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp	6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI

Power

155 hp

116 kW

150 hp

112 kW

Torque

240 Nm

177 lb-ft

250 Nm

184 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.7 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

210 km/h130 mph

Restricted

200 km/h124 mph

203 km/h

126 mph

Lightness

1,293 kg

2,851 lb

1,470 kg

3,241 lb

Fuel consumption

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

6.9 L/100 km

34.1 mpg US

40.9 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	426 L 15.0 cu ft
Length	4,380 mm 172.4 in
Height	1,495 mm 58.9 in

Range score

667 km

414 mi

725 km

450 mi

Trunk score

456 L

16.1 cu ft

426 L

15.0 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

120 hp/t

89 kW/t

8.3 kg/hp

102 hp/t

76 kW/t

9.8 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost	Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI
Consumption	6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK	6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	11.03 LC100 km	12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	17.74 LC100 mi	19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	945 L250 US gal208 UK gal	1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,654 LC/year	1,811 LC/year