Peugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Peugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023 1.2vsKia XCeed · Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKia XCeed · Facelift 2026
1.6 T-GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed206 km/h128 mph
- Lightest1,297 kg2,859 lb
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range880 km547 mi
- Largest trunk434 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136hp101kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,297kg2,859lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.9s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 78.3s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 56.1s Calculated | 70.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 880km547mi Calculated | 725km450mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,199cc73cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,304mm169in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,826mm72in |
| Height | 1,550mm61in | 1,495mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,605mm103in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 434L | 426L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,467L | 1,378L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2: Power / Torque
- Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 56.1 s | 70.7 s |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI has 14 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 8.3 s |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 8.7 s |
Although Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI has more power, Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 880 km 547 mi |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 725 km 450 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.3 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp 101 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 880 km 547 mi | 725 km 450 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 434 L 15.3 cu ft | 426 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 | Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Is 173 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 155 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























