Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 200dvsKia XCeed · Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKia XCeed · Facelift 2026
1.6 T-GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range852 km530 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight102 hp/t76 kW/t9.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 78.3s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 73.4s Calculated | 70.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.7s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.7s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 852km530mi Calculated | 725km450mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,826mm72in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,495mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 426L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | 1,378L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: Power / Torque
- Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.2 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 73.4 s | 70.7 s |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.7 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 137 km/h 85 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 9.2 s |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d and Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 852 km 530 mi |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 725 km 450 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | KiaXCeedFacelift 20261.6 T-GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.2 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 852 km 530 mi | 725 km 450 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 426 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d | Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 128 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Has 144 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Kia XCeed Facelift 2026 1.6 T-GDI
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























