Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2019-2020
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    968 km
    601 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,655 kg
    3,649 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
238hp177kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
73.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
25.3s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
968km601mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,486mm177in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,673mm66in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,677mm105in
2,945mm116in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
168mm7in
Trunk volume
615L
-
Max trunk volume
1,655L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.3 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI has 2 hp more than Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.5 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
968 km
601 mi
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.5 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
968 km
601 mi
880 km
547 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
-
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 124 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 47 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 88 km (55 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
25d
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
300
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 BiTDI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
650T
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster