Car comparison

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Tarraco

2.0 TSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Highest torque
    376 Nm
    277 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,655 kg
    3,649 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    880 km
    547 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatTarraco2.0 TSIFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
245hp183kW
238hp177kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,698kg3,743lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
2,440kg5,379lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
67.9s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
27.0s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
652km405mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,735mm186in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,674mm66in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,790mm110in
2,945mm116in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,574mm62in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance-
168mm7in
Max trunk volume
700L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI5,250-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatTarraco2.0 TSIFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.0 s
-
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI has 7 hp more than Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1,698 kg
3,743 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
229 km/h
142 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI6.2 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
652 km
405 mi
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.2 s
229 km/h
142 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.2 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatTarraco2.0 TSIFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
245 hp
183 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
6.6 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,698 kg
3,743 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
652 km
405 mi
880 km
547 mi
Trunk score
700 L
24.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSIFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 36 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 6 Nm more
  • Is 43 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 228 km (142 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster