Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250vsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)

GLB 250

224 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    376 Nm
    277 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,655 kg
    3,649 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    880 km
    547 mi
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250

  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
224hp167kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,670kg3,682lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
2,205kg4,861lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
76.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
27.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
811km504mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,834mm72in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,829mm111in
2,945mm116in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
135mm5in
168mm7in
Trunk volume
570L
-
Max trunk volume
1,805L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
169g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 2505,800 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,050 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.7 s
-
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
224 hp
167 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
1,670 kg
3,682 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
236 km/h
147 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 2506.9 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
811 km
504 mi
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
224 hp
167 kW
6.9 s
236 km/h
147 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
224 hp
167 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
6.6 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,670 kg
3,682 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
811 km
504 mi
880 km
547 mi
CO2 score
169 g/km
-
Trunk score
570 L
20.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250

  • Has 43 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 15 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GLB 250
GLB 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
2.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
GLB 250
GLB 200 58 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 200 58 kWh
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
GLB 250
GLA 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250
2.0 EcoBoost
25d
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
GLB 250
GLA 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250
2.0 EcoBoost
300
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
GLB 250
GLA 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
GLB 250
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
2.0 EcoBoost
650T
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsChevroletBlazer650T
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster