Car comparison

Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari GTC4Lusso T

3.9 V8

610 hp3855 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2017-present
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Track Edition 3.8 V6

570 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2016-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    610 hp
    455 kW
  • Highest torque
    760 Nm
    561 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    351 hp/t
    261 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    265 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    784 km
    487 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    81/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    57/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
610hp455kW
570hp425kW
Torque
760Nm561lb-ft
637Nm470lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,745kg3,847lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
75.3s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
39.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.8s
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
351hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb
Calculated
327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
437Nm/t292lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
784km487mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,855cc235cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,922mm194in
4,710mm185in
Width
1,980mm78in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,383mm54in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,990mm118in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,674mm66in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,668mm66in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
450L
315L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
91L
74L
CO2 emissions
265g/km
275g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V87,500 rpm3,000-5,250 rpm7,750 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,300-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.8 s
7.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
49.4 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.4 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
205 km/h
127 mph
228 km/h
142 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
610 hp
455 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW

Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 has 40 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
760 Nm
561 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
637 Nm
470 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
1,745 kg
3,847 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V83.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V62.8 s

Although Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
351 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
784 km
487 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
610 hp
455 kW
3.5 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
Power
610 hp
455 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
Power
610 hp
455 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
3.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
351 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
610 hp
455 kW
570 hp
425 kW
Torque
760 Nm
561 lb-ft
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
784 km
487 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
265 g/km
275 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
351 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 123 Nm more
  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 135 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Track Edition 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.9 V8
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8vsFerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8vsFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8vsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
3.9 V8
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8vsFerrari458 Speciale4.5 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
C 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
3.9 V8
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8vsFerrariFF6.3 V12
Track Edition 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8vsFerrari488 GTB3.9 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster