Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017

C 4.0 V8

557 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2017-2021
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Track Edition 3.8 V6

570 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2016-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    317 km/h
    197 mph
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    343 hp/t
    256 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.4 L/100 km
    20.6 mpg US
    24.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.1 L/100 km
    15.6 mpg US
    18.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    259 g/km
  • Best economy score
    76/100

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Most powerful
    570 hp
    425 kW
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    627 km
    390 mi
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
557hp415kW
570hp425kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
637Nm470lb-ft
Curb weight
1,625kg3,583lb
1,745kg3,847lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
52.6s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph
Calculated
39.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.3s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
343hp/t256kW/t155hp/1000 lb
Calculated
327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
418Nm/t280lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
570km354mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,544mm179in
4,710mm185in
Width-
1,895mm75in
Height
1,287mm51in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,684mm66in
1,590mm63in
Rear track-
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
96mm4in
105mm4in
Trunk volume-
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
65L
74L
CO2 emissions
259g/km
275g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V85,750-6,750 rpm1,900-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,300-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.3 s
7.9 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
210 km/h
131 mph
228 km/h
142 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
557 hp
415 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
637 Nm
470 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
1,745 kg
3,847 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
317 km/h
197 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V83.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V62.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
343 hp/t
256 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
570 km
354 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
557 hp
415 kW
3.7 s
317 km/h
197 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
Power
557 hp
415 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,287 mm
50.7 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
Power
557 hp
415 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
3.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
343 hp/t
256 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
557 hp
415 kW
570 hp
425 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
2.8 s
Top speed
317 km/h
197 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
Fuel consumption
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,287 mm
50.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
570 km
354 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
259 g/km
275 g/km
Trunk score
-
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
343 hp/t
256 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6
Consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.95 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.11 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,993 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8

  • Has 43 Nm more
  • Is 120 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) C 4.0 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Track Edition 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
C 4.0 V8
63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
C 4.0 V8
C 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
C 4.0 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
C 4.0 V8
AMG S 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63
Track Edition 3.8 V6
R 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017R 4.0 V8
C 4.0 V8
FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017 C 4.0 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster