Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Track Edition 3.8 V6

570 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2016-2022
VS

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020

5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2019-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,743 kg
    3,843 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    330 hp/t
    246 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    252 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    636 km
    395 mi
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
570hp425kW
575hp429kW
Torque
637Nm470lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,743kg3,843lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
-
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
39.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
54.4s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
7.9s
Calculated
10.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
11.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
330hp/t246kW/t150hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
402Nm/t269lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
627km390mi
Calculated
636km395mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,710mm185in
4,470mm176in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,311mm52in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,622mm103in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
-
Trunk volume
315L
299L
Max trunk volume-
509L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
74L
70L
CO2 emissions
275g/km
252g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,300-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V86,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.9 s
10.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
11.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
228 km/h
142 mph
208 km/h
130 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has 5 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
1,743 kg
3,843 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V62.8 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V83.7 s

Although Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
330 hp/t
246 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
627 km
390 mi
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
636 km
395 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
3.7 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
330 hp/t
246 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
575 hp
429 kW
Torque
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,743 kg
3,843 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Range score
627 km
390 mi
636 km
395 mi
CO2 score
275 g/km
252 g/km
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
330 hp/t
246 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km19.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi30.98 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year2,888 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6

  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 63 Nm more
  • Is 2 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 9 km (6 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 23 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) Track Edition 3.8 V6
Jaguar F-type Coupe 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
C 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8
5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
GT3 RS 4.0
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)GT3 RS 4.0
5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Track Edition 3.8 V6
S 6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
Track Edition 3.8 V6
GT 3.8 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6vsMcLaren570SGT 3.8 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 vs Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster