Nissan GT-R (R35)
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Track Edition 3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful570 hp425 kW
- Highest torque637 Nm470 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight327 hp/t244 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score75/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 485hp362kW | 570hp425kW |
| Torque | 588Nm434lb-ft | 637Nm470lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 39.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 597km371mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 275g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,200-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,300-5,800 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 7.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW |
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 has 85 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 3.5 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 597 km 371 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 485 hp 362 kW | 570 hp 425 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 597 km 371 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 275 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6
- Has 85 hp more
- Has 49 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























