Nissan GT-R (R35)
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6vsChevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6)
Z06 7.0 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8
- Most powerful505 hp377 kW
- Highest torque637 Nm470 lb-ft
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Best power-to-weight351 hp/t262 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk634 L
- Best practicality score50/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 485hp362kW | 505hp377kW |
| Torque | 588Nm434lb-ft | 637Nm470lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 53.1s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 11.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 351hp/t262kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated | 442Nm/t296lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 597km371mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 7,011cc428cu in |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,460mm176in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,928mm76in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,237mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 634L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,200-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 6,300 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 11.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 505 hp 377 kW |
Chevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8 has 20 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Chevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 3.5 s |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 3.8 s |
Although Chevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Chevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 351 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | 505 hp 377 kW | 3.8 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | ChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 485 hp 362 kW | 505 hp 377 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 306 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 597 km 371 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 634 L 22.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 351 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet Corvette Coupe (C6) Z06 7.0 i V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 49 Nm more
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Has 72 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 319 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























