Car comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017

SVR 5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2019-2020
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

Track Edition 3.8 V6

570 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2016-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    322 km/h
    200 mph
  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,630 kg
    3,594 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    353 hp/t
    263 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.4 L/100 km
    15.3 mpg US
    18.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    249 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    642 km
    399 mi
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
575hp429kW
570hp425kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
637Nm470lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,745kg3,847lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
53.6s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
39.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.3s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
642km399mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,475mm176in
4,710mm185in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,311mm52in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,611mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
310L
315L
Max trunk volume
408L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
70L
74L
CO2 emissions
249g/km
275g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V86,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,300-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.3 s
7.9 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
211 km/h
131 mph
228 km/h
142 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has 5 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
1,745 kg
3,847 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
3.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Power
575 hp
429 kW
570 hp
425 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
2.8 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
642 km
399 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
249 g/km
275 g/km
Trunk score
310 L
10.9 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 63 Nm more
  • Is 115 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 26 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Track Edition 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Track Edition 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster