Ferrari GTC4Lusso T
Car comparison
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8vsFerrari California T 3.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California T
3.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight351 hp/t261 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range784 km487 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score57/100
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions250 g/km
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 610hp455kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 755Nm557lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.3s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s | 11.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 351hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated | 345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 437Nm/t292lb-ft/ton Calculated | 465Nm/t311lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 784km487mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,855cc235cu in | 3,855cc235cu in |
| Length | 4,922mm194in | 4,570mm180in |
| Width | 1,980mm78in | 1,910mm75in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,990mm118in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,674mm66in | 1,631mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,668mm66in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 241L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 340L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 91L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 265g/km | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,250 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 11.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 49.4 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 610 hp 455 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 has 50 hp more than Ferrari California T 3.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 3.5 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 3.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 and Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 351 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 784 km 487 mi |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 610 hp 455 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.6 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 351 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 610 hp 455 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 784 km 487 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 265 g/km | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 241 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 351 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 | Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 209 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























