Car comparison

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8vsJaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari California T

3.9 V8

560 hp3855 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2014-2017
VS

Jaguar F-type Coupe

R 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Most powerful
    560 hp
    418 kW
  • Highest torque
    755 Nm
    557 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    345 hp/t
    257 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    250 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    743 km
    462 mi
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    45/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
Power
560hp418kW
550hp410kW
Torque
755Nm557lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,625kg3,583lb
1,650kg3,638lb
Gross weight-
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
61.2s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.6s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
11.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
12.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb
Calculated
333hp/t249kW/t151hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
465Nm/t311lb-ft/ton
Calculated
412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
743km462mi
Calculated
654km407mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,855cc235cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,570mm180in
4,470mm176in
Width
1,910mm75in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,322mm52in
1,321mm52in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,622mm103in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,628mm64in
Ground clearance-
121mm5in
Trunk volume
241L
315L
Max trunk volume
340L
407L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
78L
70L
CO2 emissions
250g/km
255g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V87,500 rpm4,750 rpm7,750 rpm
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V86,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.6 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
11.9 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
12.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
202 km/h
126 mph
201 km/h
125 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
560 hp
418 kW
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8 and Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
755 Nm
557 lb-ft
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
1,650 kg
3,638 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
315 km/h
196 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V83.6 s
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V84.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
743 km
462 mi
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
654 km
407 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
560 hp
418 kW
3.6 s
315 km/h
196 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
241 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,321 mm
52.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
3.6 s
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
755 Nm
557 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.6 s
4.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
Fuel consumption
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
241 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,321 mm
52.0 in
Range score
743 km
462 mi
654 km
407 mi
CO2 score
250 g/km
255 g/km
Trunk score
241 L
8.5 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari California T 3.9 V8Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8
Consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.38 LC100 km18.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.57 LC100 mi30.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,756 LC/year2,809 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8

  • Has 74 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.9 V8
30 4.3 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
3.9 V8
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrari458 Spider4.5 V8
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleR 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrari458 Speciale4.5 V8
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrari458 Italia4.5 V8
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8
3.9 V8
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrariFF6.3 V12
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 vs Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster