Ferrari FF
Car comparison
Ferrari FF 6.3 V12vsFerrari California T 3.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California T
3.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Highest torque755 Nm557 lb-ft
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions250 g/km
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score79/100
Ferrari FF 6.3 V12
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph
- Most powerful660 hp492 kW
- Best power-to-weight369 hp/t275 kW/t2.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best practicality score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariFF6.3 V12 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 660hp492kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 683Nm504lb-ft | 755Nm557lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.2s Calculated | 11.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 369hp/t275kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated | 345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 382Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated | 465Nm/t311lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 591km367mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,262cc382cu in | 3,855cc235cu in |
| Length | 4,907mm193in | 4,570mm180in |
| Width | 1,953mm77in | 1,910mm75in |
| Height | 1,379mm54in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,990mm118in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,631mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 241L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 340L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 91L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 360g/km | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari FF 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 8,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariFF6.3 V12 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.2 s | 11.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 39.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 213 km/h 132 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 660 hp 492 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Ferrari FF 6.3 V12 has 100 hp more than Ferrari California T 3.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Ferrari FF 6.3 V12: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 683 Nm 504 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 3.7 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 3.6 s |
Although Ferrari FF 6.3 V12 has more power, Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Ferrari FF 6.3 V12: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Ferrari FF 6.3 V12: 4.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 369 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 591 km 367 mi |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 660 hp 492 kW | 3.7 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.6 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 |
| 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariFF6.3 V12 | 369 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariFF6.3 V12 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 660 hp 492 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 683 Nm 504 lb-ft | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 591 km 367 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 360 g/km | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 241 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 369 hp/t 275 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari FF 6.3 V12 | Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.95 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.37 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,043 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari FF 6.3 V12
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 209 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Has 72 Nm more
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 152 km (94 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 110 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























