Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsZeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Zeekr 9X

2.0T 55 kWh

279 hp1974 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh

Quickest 0-100 km/h
3.9 s
Most powerful
279 hp
208 kW
Best overall score
73/100
Best performance score
65/100
Best practicality score
91/100

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

Fastest top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Lightest
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
Best power-to-weight
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Best economy score
83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh
Power	265hp198kW	279hp208kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	-
Curb weight	1,675kg3,693lb	2,970kg6,548lb
Gross weight	2,290kg5,049lb	3,480kg7,672lb
Top speed	243 km/h 151 mph	240 km/h 149 mph
To 99% top speed	67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated	63.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	5.9s	3.9s
0-200 km/h	22.4s Calculated	18.6s Calculated
0-60 mph	5.6s Calculated	3.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	14.0s Calculated	12.3s Calculated
Power-to-weight	158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated	94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated	-
Estimated range	682km424mi Calculated	-
Displacement	1,984cc121cu in	1,974cc120cu in
Length	4,519mm178in	5,239mm206in
Width	1,869mm74in	2,029mm80in
Height	1,586mm62in	1,819mm72in
Wheelbase	2,681mm106in	3,169mm125in
Front track	1,590mm63in	1,725mm68in
Rear track	1,580mm62in	1,739mm68in
Ground clearance	-	288mm11in
Trunk volume	540L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	6
Fuel tank	60L	-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	5.6 s	3.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	5.9 s	3.9 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	22.4 s	18.6 s
Top speed	243 km/h 151 mph	240 km/h 149 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.4 s	1.8 s
330 ft 101 m	6.1 s	5.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.2 s	7.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.8 s	10.2 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.0 s	12.3 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	166 km/h 103 mph	175 km/h 109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	265 hp 198 kW
Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh	279 hp 208 kW

Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh has 14 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh: 14 hp (10 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	1,675 kg 3,693 lb
Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh	2,970 kg 6,548 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	243 km/h 151 mph
Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh	240 km/h 149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	5.9 s
Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh	3.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 2.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp
Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh	94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI	265 hp 198 kW	5.9 s	243 km/h 151 mph
Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh	279 hp 208 kW	3.9 s	240 km/h 149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

CupraTerramar2.0 TSI

Power	265 hp 198 kW
0-100 km/h	5.9 s
Top speed 243 km/h 151 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	540 L 19.1 cu ft
Length	4,519 mm 177.9 in
Height	1,586 mm 62.4 in

Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh

Power	279 hp 208 kW
0-100 km/h	3.9 s
Top speed 240 km/h 149 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 6 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,239 mm 206.3 in
Height	1,819 mm 71.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

CupraTerramar2.0 TSI

Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh

Power

265 hp

198 kW

279 hp

208 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

Acceleration

5.9 s

3.9 s

Top speed

243 km/h

151 mph

240 km/h

149 mph

Lightness

1,675 kg

3,693 lb

2,970 kg

6,548 lb

Fuel consumption

8.8 L/100 km

26.7 mpg US

32.1 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	540 L 19.1 cu ft
Length	4,519 mm 177.9 in
Height	1,586 mm 62.4 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 6 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,239 mm 206.3 in
Height	1,819 mm 71.6 in

Range score

682 km

424 mi

Trunk score

540 L

19.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

158 hp/t

118 kW/t

6.3 kg/hp

94 hp/t

70 kW/t

10.6 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Consumption	8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,310 LC/year