Zeekr 9X
Car comparison
Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
EQE 300 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful279 hp208 kW
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Lightest2,370 kg5,225 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 279hp208kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | - | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,970kg6,548lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Gross weight | 3,480kg7,672lb | 3,055kg6,735lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,974cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 5,239mm206in | 4,863mm191in |
| Width | 2,029mm80in | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,819mm72in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,169mm125in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,725mm68in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,739mm68in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 288mm11in | 181mm7in |
| Trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | 279 hp 208 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 265 hp 198 kW |
Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh and Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh: 14 hp (10 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | 2,970 kg 6,548 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh: 3.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | 279 hp 208 kW | 3.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Zeekr9X2.0T 55 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 279 hp 208 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,970 kg 6,548 lb | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Zeekr 9X 2.0T 55 kWh
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 3.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Is 600 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























